--- In SkunkworksAMA_at_y..., "Stanley L. Alston, Jr." <leoni2_at_j...>
wrote:
> > Heh, we all knew that ZZ always liked a challenge, right?
> > And this one looks like a BIIIG one...Gee, 'James' that is
> > one gigantic Lady ya have there....
>
> James: Thanke ye, lad, but she's only me wee little lass. ;)
> But we aren't beink tat big. Aye be 6' 6" 'n me lass be 6' 3".
>
> > Hmm, just my perverted mind at play again and it is not meant as
> > criticism here but...well...how can you really satisfy that BIG
> > Fem-Horse? I mean, big body, big hole..and even if ZZ can take a
> > LOT...it still must more feel like a rather small feat to that
> > Horse-Girl....O.o;
>
> James: Hey, lad, aye'm certainly ain't be small where its
> count. Aye mean, Zig just happens to be able to cover me willie in
> tae picture. But, ye haven't seen tae lass at work. ;) She tends to
> be likin' her men big. ;) But let me tell ye lad, she can certainly
> drain me good. ;)
>
> Stanley
Hmm..still...I know it doesn't mean anything in pics but if we look
at it logically, your Meat would only be able to reach into the
height of ZZ's upper belly, if that far, and that, after comparing
the size of your woody to the size of yer lass, would make you a tad
small for your lass, ain't I righ`t?
Btw, I beat ya...I read the post, I flipped through the folder and
didn't find the pic...
-Shad "Just something that shows that I: A. am lightning fast,
sometimes. and B: don't have a life outside of here O.o;" Devil
Received on Thu Oct 04 2001 - 20:22:04 CDT