Re: For James: about human sex with furries

From: J. Hardiman <jmhcustomart_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 20:36:39 -0000

--- In SkunkworksAMA_at_y..., Crazy Cat <crazycat_at_o...> wrote:
> ~~~ You did? In that "Guest Of Honor" comic? Where? I must be
stupid as
> well as insane because I didn't saw that hint. What have told me
that no
> human never had full sex with a furry in your universe is what Lori
said, like:
> "A panel of furry anatomy? Hosted by humans? What could THEY
possibly know?"
> or even worse, with: "Okay- first lesson. How many of you have seen
a real
> pussy? No, no, dreams don't count. Girlie magazines either. Geez,
don't
> everybody raise their hands at once!"
>
> And, in that comic, the only thing a human seem to do something
(with Lori)
> is, you guessit, oral. That's why I thought that human wasn't
allowed to
> have sex with furries, or some crap.
 

  Yup, that was the scene that hinted at the off-camera sex. Such
interactions between species can't be shown in the comics because
Radio Comix doesn't allow it. And that's okay with me. Sometimes
it's better to let the imagination fill in the blanks.


> By the way, in that comic, who's that guy with that robot-looking
face? I
> don't recall him at all. Natasha seem to know him very well,
thought.


  That's TRUMP. I have a copy of a comic he drew a few years ago,
and that is his self-portrait (or as close to it as I could get).
His art kicks ass.


> > Why oral? Because that's my favorite! The comics don't usually
> >display too wide a selection of sex acts, though.
>
> ~~~ Well, I admit, my personal preference is the comics. Why?
Because it's
> so damn funny!! I like your sense of humor. I would have bought
every
> issues with your comics in it if I knew it would arrive at my home
safely
> (I'm Canadian, you know what that mean. Grrr!). All the comics I
saw was
> from the net, shared by my friends and such. Your folios looks very
good
> too, but it's not the same for me.
>
> >The folios show a
> >bunch of different stuff. Looking for something in particular?
>
> ~~~I only saw a very few of your portfolio stuff (most is from here
or
> before in your web site), but from what I saw you sure have the
variety in
> those. It's just with humans that seem to be the same oral sex
thing.
> If I'm looking for something in particular? Well, in the art part,
I would
> like to see any drawing with a feline in it. There is one in
particular I
> saw in a thumbnail size somewhere, a feline that seem to have a
little
> trouble with a wool ball. In the comics part, I miss the last 2
pages of
> "Cough in the camera's eye" and another one I barely remember that
mention
> something about shaving?


  Keep your eyes peeled for some more art I'll be uploading this
weekend, including some human/feline interaction. ;)


> Oh, and while I'm at it, can you tell me what those 3 little brats,
errr, I
> mean charming little skunks wanted to do in your room in one of the
comics?
> Ya know, the one when they tried to enter one after the other and
you were
> still awake? I didn't get the joke (told you, I'm stoopid!).


  Actually, that comic bombed. I tried to compress the joke in 2
pages, and I probably should've used the original 4. Because of the
compression, the joke got fucked up. Anyway...
  There's no hint about what the 3 of them were going to do.
Essentially, they wanted to do something mischievous, and kept
checking in my character's room to see if he was still awake. Every
time they opened the door, they woke him up. Unfortunately, none of
the girls knew that her sisters were also checking on Jim. So after
one girl would close the door and leave, another one would show up 10
minutes later as Jim was starting to fall back asleep. Hence,
Natasha's comment about "Maybe we should change our tactics".
Confusing? Hell, yes. Did I screw it up? Hell, yes.

--JMH
Received on Fri Oct 19 2001 - 13:38:18 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:51:18 CST