Soooo many messages...
Yeah, I've got the Activelist back online, and it should stay up. If
all the interested parties would use that, it should solve our chat
room problems, but I don't know how many people there are that
don't/can't/won't use it. Evo is looking into other options (hear
that Evo? Look into it =P) . I'd like to have somthing like the
moderated VIP chat rooms I've used when mobs of people all wanted to
talk to one person, but I'm not sure how to set that up (I'm not too
IRC savvy).
Oh well, there's always something new to learn. We'll get this
cleared up.
BTW, about the posts before this, I thank you guys for clearing up
the junk posts on your own. I was getting a lil peeved (tho I'm
trying not to be a hardass about it) about the crap that was being
flooded around here, and I'm very glad to see that you realized it
after awhile and cut it. I have no problem if things drift a bit or
there's a recurring off-topic joke, but when it gets really off
course like that it needs to come to a stop, and I'm glad that we
seem to've all reached a consensus about where the line is. Maybe I
don't have to be an ogre now ^_^
--- In SkunkworksAMA_at_y..., "ELHxEvolved" <evolved_at_t...> wrote:
> Ya, Thy ::::||||>>>>SHOULD<<<<||||::: have it up when he gets back,
but i've
> gotten nothing outa him, wondering if he got stuck somewhere
now..........
>
> -ELHxEvolved
> Fighting for a Past and Future Secret
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shad Devil [mailto:Shad_Devil_at_g...]
> Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2001 7:19 PM
> To: SkunkworksAMA_at_y...
> Subject: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: this stupid chat
>
>
> --- In SkunkworksAMA_at_y..., Owen Williams <ywwg_at_u...> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2001-10-14 at 20:54, An Omnibus wrote:
> > > when I log into the chat I see we're in *g.SkunkworksAMA:2. I
> get the
> > > feeling most people are in a different room, and the spillover
> goes
> > > here. What room are other people in?
> > >
> >
> > it seems yahoo chat has an extremely low limit for its chat
rooms,
> and
> > once it gets over that everyone spills into the next room. we
need
> to
> > find another way of chatting, I think. do people agree?
>
> Yes, yes, agreed! Since I can't access the chat anyway, this is
> actually a good news to me >;P
>
> What about the ICQ-Active List? As soon as Thy is back, it will be
> online again...
>
> -Shad "A star on the horizon?" Devil
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
Received on Sat Oct 27 2001 - 23:34:44 CDT