Re: Photoshoppy?

From: Shad Devil <Shad_Devil_at_gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 07:49:00 -0000

--- In SkunkworksAMA_at_y..., belzy_2002_at_y... wrote:
>
> > not bad, but it looks very photoshoppy, and Tom looks far too
> smooth. I
> > guess the _color_ is ok, but there's no _texture_.
> >
> > owen
>
> To Photo shoppy? Aw come on give me a break, I've only been using
> digatal paint programs for about 5 months now. Seriously though, I
am
> quite aware of the fact my fur lacks texture and it is one of the
> things I'm working on I decided not to do it with these pics
because
> my goals for my self while doing this is 1) Relax have a little fun
> and see what I come up with, I'm not even sure I'll keep Tom the
same
> color all the through, 2) I have liked James' work sense I first
laid
> eyes on it this is a good way to study it and learn a little more
> about styles and techniques, espiclly inking, wich I am not at a
> level I would like to be at. 3) Show my apprection to the artist
for
> all the giggles I got out of his work. 4) Revenge against the
artist
> for the pages of my zines that are now permantly stuck together
>:),
> and last, some days I just don't have any freakin ideas of my own.


Aww, don't worry, you're doing fine, mate. Too fine, actually...now I
am even more worried if my clumsy attempts can even lift an eyebrow
after your colorings...-.-.

-Shad "No-self-confidence-Boy, to the Rescue!" Devil
Received on Mon Nov 12 2001 - 23:49:04 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:51:20 CST