Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: Bondage?

From: <Jhixson999_at_aol.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 21:58:14 EST

In a message dated 1/4/2002 9:50:41 PM Eastern Standard Time,
jace_at_softhome.net writes:


> It's called TACT, moron. Look it up.

Yes, how tactful.

Why is it I have the feeling this is becoming a flame war?

OK. Bondage is not 'Lame'. True, there are some that don't like it, some that
do. That comes with *everything*. I havn't seen anyone persecuting anyone,
it's all 'I Like' 'I don't'. No need to take offense here.

Secondly, Bondage isn't exactly humiliating (However if you see it that way,
Okay...). One person is bound, but that restriction is part of what excites
them; they can't touch the person pleasing them, or they can be teased
without retaliationg, backing away. It's exhilirating to not be in control;
it's all about control, infact. Humiliation would likely be tieing them up in
public, or just being cruel.

-Xarlen
Received on Fri Jan 04 2002 - 18:58:17 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:51:24 CST