Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: Bondage?

From: Ross Sauer <patch_at_bytehead.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 00:15:31 -0600

----- Original Message -----
From: Rann Aridorn <rann-chan_at_attbi.com>
To: <SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:23 PM
Subject: Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: Bondage?


> Ross Sauer wrote:
>
> >>I'm sure bondage enthusiasts everywhere will do their best not to miss
> >>
> > you.
> >
> >>Jace Draccus
> >>
> >
> > Just what the hell are you implying here?
> > Because it sure sounds like you're dismissing me simply because I said I
> > don't like something.
>
>
> I think what's bothering Jace is the fact that people seem to feel the
> need to state that they're not into bondage. It's just a little like
> someone suddenly saying "What's with all this gay stuff lately? I mean,
> I don't mind homosexuals, it's just not my thing." It's not the same
> thing, just a comparison.
> I suppose it bothers him (and me, just a tiny bit) that people feel the
> need to state they're not into it, as if they had to make very sure
> everyone knew, as if being into bondage were something to be ashamed of.

That wasn't my intention when I first asked if anyone besides me not likes
bondage.
I never condemmed it, or slammed those who like it.
I just stated that its something I don't like.
That's all.

> This group has stuff that's NOT bondage all the time. It's the norm
> around here. A few people brought bondage up, and there was some fanart
> posted with it.

I've just always seen the person being tied up as wanting to be humilated.
And it looks damm uncomfortable! <G>

> *sigh* Furry fandom is surprisingly intolerant, I've found. But a rant
> isn't what I'm after. If bondage doesn't do it for you, that's fine. Why
> feel the need to tell everyone that it doesn't do it for you? If you
> don't like it, you don't have to look at the pics or engage in any of
> the practices. There's no need to proclaim it to everyone.

I guess the main reason I asked was to see how many others here prefer
pin-ups or "regular" sex to the kinky stuff.
I'm in no way a prude, but even the SW girls have their limits too.
(I think Jim wrote that for the girls, they won't do "water sports," or
crapping into each other's face, or rape or especially not with little
kids!)

The last one is obviously out of bounds, and should always be illegal.
No matter what NAMBLA or the Rene Guyon society wants.

Being kinky, with CONSENTING adults, is ok.

Actually, I think the best thing to do is just drop the subject.
Received on Fri Jan 04 2002 - 22:15:22 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:51:24 CST