Re: [SkunkworksAMA] OT, but... argh!

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: <AtMSWolf_at_aol.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 17:27:12 EST

we ...are... doomed...
to qoute Bob.. "This is bad. VERY bad."

In a message dated 1/19/02 1:23:05 PM Pacific Standard Time, syrob_at_yahoo.com
writes:

> Don't mean to continue the OT threads, but this is just wrong...
>
> http://www.msnbc.com/news/690661.asp
Received on Sat Jan 19 2002 - 14:27:20 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ravenwood: "Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: Hat Trick Part 1"
Previous message: Borys Y'zzuf: "[SkunkworksAMA] OT, but... argh!"
Maybe in reply to: Borys Y'zzuf: "[SkunkworksAMA] OT, but... argh!"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:51:26 CST