Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: Hidden Site

From: Rann Aridorn <rann-chan_at_attbi.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 08:57:15 -0600

payne_brandon wrote:

> But how is one suppose to know what not to look at if they cannot see
> it? If there were thumbnails posted then one could know of what not
> to enlarge. I have yet to look at it (public library being the
> reason) and from the comments that were posted, I feel as if I might
> regret it if I were to look. But the temptation of just wanting to
> know. Remember Adam and Eve?


Not really. I'm not as old as the birth of humanity, so I don't really
remember them. u.u
Joking aside, it was made pretty plain when it was posted and by its
description that it was not for the faint-hearted. If you prefer tamer
stuff, it's been made plenty obvious that the posted image and the stuff
that will probably be on the hidden site most likely isn't for you.
Besides, people will still gripe over anything, even seeing the images
in thumbnail form. All it took was a few mentions of bondage awhile back
for people to start piping up "I don't like it" and "It's lame" for no
other reason, apparently, than to assure the world that they didn't care
for something.
In short, it's just bitching, which is something I'm sure that most of
us can get in abundance in our home or work environment and don't need
to find waiting for us in our inbox.

-Rann
Received on Wed Feb 20 2002 - 06:57:15 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:51:28 CST