--- In SkunkworksAMA_at_y..., Scrapper BlackDragon <scrapperbd_at_y...>
wrote:
> --- Chris Yost <cyost_at_c...> wrote:
> > At 09:44 PM 3/2/02 -0500, you wrote:
> > >Is Natasha hotter than the woman from Dark Angel? I
> > need to prove to my
> > >Mundane friend that she is, and you can help me!
> >
> > Let me think for a moment, YES! :)
> >
> > >>>>>Chris
> Thank-you Chris, we know that, now to try prove it!
>
> Ten reasons why Natasha is better than Max - Dark
> Angel
> - We've all seen that Natasha has hot booty, though
> with Max, we're still just guessing (unless someone
> has a good link???)
>
> - If you met Natasha, there is more chance that you'd
> get 'pashed' as opposed to 'smashed'.
>
> - Natasha is always ready to play around. Max only
> comes in season every three months.
>
> - Natasha has two sisters, who you've also got a
> chance with. Max's sisters are more likely to kill
> you. Or her brothers will...
>
> - If you aren't Logan, Max isn't likely to be
> interested in you (unless she's in season). If you
> are male and alive, you have a chance with Natasha.
> (that's a chance, not a guarantee!)
>
> - Natasha works in the family business, guaranteed
> good employment. Max is a courier (that means limited
> life expectancy!) or a thief. Be grateful if their's
> food on the table.
>
> - If you like Max, everyone is always saying Buffy is
> better. If you like Natasha, she's really only got
> her sisters for competition, so no real loss there.
>
> - On Natasha, all over body hair is cool. Not a good
> thought on Max...
>
> - If you're a tail male. NO contest!
>
> - You're unlikely to have Lydecker and his goons
> interrupt a 'romantic moment' if you're with Natasha.
>
> Scrapper, Black Dragon, scraping the bottom and sides
> of his imagination to fill this one... Anyfur got a
> few more to add here?
Ok..NOW I'm confused....I thought I knew what Dark Angel as..(Knows a
Manga ith that name) but obviously it doesn't fit what I just
heard...HO or WHAT is this Max?
-Shad "Confused Panther" Devil
Received on Tue Mar 05 2002 - 16:24:11 CST