Re: 4891 (Detailed enough?)

From: shad_devil <Shad_Devil_at_gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 10:32:38 -0000

--- In SkunkworksAMA_at_y..., "funkywolfen" <funkywolfen_at_y...> wrote:
> > > Before I tackle the task of drawing any of the Skunk Girls, I
> > > took some cuntshot practices (since nearly all female pics here
> > > have a decent amount of clitoral exposure :p)
> > > Just wondering if its detailed enough (or even up to Hardiman's
> > > possible expetactions)
> > > It's a little ugly cos I used markers.
> > > http://ffn.lonefox.org/~loupgarou/misc/wideopen.jpg
> > > hope ya all liked it.
> >
> > Damn! Well, _I_ sure as hell liked it! Nice work, man! Gotta
> > love those spread shots!
> > --JMH
>
>
> :) "da Man" Hardiman Hath Spoken!
> hmm... who should I draw first... Lori? ...Onyx? ...maybe Treska
> *grins* ?
> And next matter of question, what she would be doing ;)

Hey, why choose? Make a Group-Shot! ^-^ But whatever you do...do it
quickly! I can't wait to see your rendition of the Skunk-Sisters!

You have the force, young Artist-Jedi, now use it wisely...and COME
TO THE Graphically-detailed-and-therefore-juicy-goodnessly-SIDE!

-Shad "What? Don't look at me like that......oh, my Fly is
open..sorry. *ziiippp*" Devil

Received on Fri Mar 22 2002 - 02:32:39 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:51:29 CST