Re: Got a ? for that lovely gal Des

From: thegayhare <Lost_angels_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:37:05 -0000

>
> Uhm, I think that's a case of technically, yes, but
> don't bother. She and Jim are an item.
>
> *hooks index fingers together to illustrate*
>
> You'd probably have better odds at dating one of the trio.


Hmmm So I'm guessing that by the same token I'd have no chance at
gettign my paws on Jim...

Ohh well
Received on Thu Apr 11 2002 - 08:52:22 CDT