Re: [SkunkworksAMA] CF is not the con you are looking for?

From: Andrew Greene <blaze_at_netaxs.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 11:45:46 -0400 (EDT)

*I* am a furry, and I say that we're loonies. Well, maybe not every one
of us. And there are several kinds of looniness in evidence. Further, I
hear furries say they go to furry cons for sex, all the time. People go
to Amway conventions for the sex, too. Anywhere people congregate for a
couple days from around the country is a fine place to have some hot,
anonymous sex. I'm not saying it's right or wrong, I'm saying it's a
fact. I want to know how many people Doodles saw? A hundred? Ten? Did he
see the same three guys five times? Did they manage to have sex with
anyone? And, moswt importantly, why is Mark Merlino being blamed? To
date, this stands as nothing but a pernicious lie. Nobody has turned up
one reference in the local gay press to Mark or anyone else promoting his
con as a place to have sex. It's been repeated so often, even the Burned
Furs believe it. And it's easier to call me a troll and not reply, then
to be shown up as a liar.

On Wed, 1 May 2002, Jason Leisemann wrote:

>
> --- Andrew Greene <blaze_at_netaxs.com> wrote:
> > You complain that
> > people attend the con to get laid, and you claim
> > they are non-furries, but
> > how can you know, Mr. Bunny? Are you psychic?
>
> Well, if they were saying that the only reason they
> were there was for the sex....
>
> And they were talking about furries in general as
> though they were loonies....
>
> What would you say about them?
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
> http://health.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Received on Wed May 01 2002 - 08:45:51 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:51:32 CST