Are you saying that you have stuck to the Burned Fur's origional purpose,
while they have drifted? Rather than state that you don't agree with them,
why don't you tell us what you DO believe? Do you believe with Eric
Blumrich's origional manifesto, pre Burned Furs? Your statement is evasive
and smacks of denial.
-----Original Message-----
From: darrel_exline [mailto:darrelx_at_polarden.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 7:58 PM
To: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: CF is not the con you are looking for?
--- In SkunkworksAMA_at_y..., "wolf_pack3000" <wolf_pack3000_at_y...> wrote:
> I could'nt agree more. These burned furs are like the old woman
who
> is spying on her neighbors she can complain about somthing.
>
> Scott.
> > > On Tuesday, April 30, 2002, at 05:04 , Ravenwood wrote:
> > >
> > > > CF is not the con it once was, now that it's run by a Burned
> > Fur. It's
Please STOP propogating this FALSE rumor.
I have not called myself a Burned Fur for over two years now, and I
really have no desire to be associated with them. Their organization
is completely off kilter and the original purpose completely lost in a
mire of confusion.
I am not a Burned Fur. ConFurence has nothing to do with the Burned
Furs. Pull your head out of your shithole and starting breathing some
fresh air.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Thu May 02 2002 - 19:18:45 CDT