Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: CF is not the con you are looking for? ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!!!

From: Andrew Greene <blaze_at_netaxs.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 11:07:21 -0400 (EDT)

I haven't seen a flame, yet. Perhaps you're mistaking uncomfortable
questions for flames? I'll agree it's off topic, tho, and request that
replies be e-mailled for the benefit of people who can't tell flame from
reasonable discussion of an issue.

On Fri, 3 May 2002, stlaljr23 wrote:

> > Me thinks the lady doth protest too much, is all
>
> During this entire time I'd kept quiet because I don't know
> what is or isn't going on with CF at this moment in time,
> and quite frankly, I don't care. But, I will say this: End
> the thread, now!!! It is really off-topic, and is only
> leading to flame after flame and quite frankly I'm sick of
> it. (And Andy, please do not reply.)
> Thank you.
>
> Stanley
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Received on Fri May 03 2002 - 08:07:25 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:51:32 CST