--- In SkunkworksAMA_at_y..., "tgreyfox" <kitsune_at_w...> wrote:
> --- In SkunkworksAMA_at_y..., "caleb_gregory" <cgregory430_at_y...> wrote:
> > 1. Bernal has the right to get pissed; though I think he should
get
> > the facts straight first. We just LOVE persuing art pirates and
> > putting them where they belong. But at this moment; we can't due
to
> a
> > yahoo glitch. Sorry; but it isn't the fault of the group, it's a
> > individual who wants us to be shut down.
>
> A good point to make. Seems a bit overbearing for two whole
pictures,
> which seem to have been modified by some goon making them pretty
well
> useless. The rather fast response makes me wonder if someone tipped
> him off.
>
> > 2. The way Bernal distributes his art is up to him; though many
of
> us
> > may not agree with the way he does. They can't all be Jim
> Hardimans.
> > Please be careful what you say on a public forum though, Jeremy;
> > because a few were insulted by that...it doesn't help in any ad
> > efforts. Strictly my opinion though...take it however you feel, I
> > mean it only to help.
>
> No, this is about what I thought too. He can sell his memberships
all
> he wants, but charging in and declaring he's gonna shut us down
here
> because some idiot who probably joined the group yesterday decided
to
> be a junior pirate makes me rather less inclined to want to spring
> $10 (US, or about $3527 Canadian ... well, not quite, but close)
for
> his stuff.
>
> Spammers, pirates, hackers bad. Artwork good. Threatening a third
> party for being hit by a sneak attack with stolen artwork not good
at
> all.
>
> -- tony
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAmen Brother. (ps... Check out animations)
Received on Thu May 16 2002 - 12:15:41 CDT