Read MY post carefully:
SHUT THE FUCK UP.
This juvenile shit does not impress me. You bring up a topic that has
been done to DEATH, in a tone that seemed to say you felt there was
wrongdoing afoot... you get told, by a very small number of people,
that it has been covered and dealt with...
... and now you feel the need to whine and whinge and act all
martyred. No-one accused _you_ of anything. No-one slandered you. No-
one is about to lynch you, or had a trial against you. Everyone, in
fact, was quite rational about it. (Well, maybe Martin wasn't, but
that's understandable. And David _was_ verging on harsh, but I can
see why.)
Hell, I was gonna let this go until you opened up your childish
little mouth. How old are you? Five?
Oh no, the bad men didn't want to discuss your little topic. They
said not nice things and bruised your fragile little ego. Oh boo hoo
hoo.
Just what the hell did you bring the topic up for in the first place,
hmmm?
I can think of two reasons. One, to make sure people are aware of it,
and to be sure there isn't a problem. Two, to make trouble.
Since you don't seem to like how the first one worked out, I'm
starting to wonder.
Yeah. Now _I_ lynched you. Not because of any accusations or
anything... but because I don't like pathetic little crybabies.
--- In SkunkworksAMA_at_y..., "mjriv1" <mjriv_at_b...> wrote:
> Read the post again CAREFULLY!!!!
> It does NOT accuse anyone of art theft. I simply observed that it
> reminded me of a character on these pages.
>
> But it seems that everyone else here is ready to point fingers MY
> way and claim things I did not say. So much for objectivety and
> rational discussion. It seems the lynch mob has already been
> formed and they have renedred a verdict against me where I was
> unaware there was even a trial.
>
> I thank you all for your clear understanding and shall not trouble
> this forum with posts in the future. I will speak to JH via email
> where I can be assuerd of a civilized answer or comment.
>
> Yes the case is closed for I will not remain to further respond to
> false accusations and slander by those who do not first make sure of
> their facts.
>
> Mike
Received on Mon Sep 02 2002 - 18:18:03 CDT