--- In SkunkworksAMA_at_y..., Jason Leisemann <jkwleisemann_at_y...> wrote:
>
> --- Shad Devil <Shad_Devil_at_g...> wrote:
> > Since I don't want to have this group deleted, too,
> > I was looking at
> > the members-list...and the result is horrific! The
> > first page alone
> > shows that over 10 members have no age on their
> > profiles. And Members
> > with no or too young an age is one of the REASON
> > groups get deleted!
>
> It has since been discovered that this isn't the case.
> Yahoo couldn't care less about our posted ages,
> because they aren't legally binding.
So... not much point in my doing anything about it, huh? Unless
an 'underage' member comes to my attention.
> Basically, it depends on whether or not they *think*
> we're violating their ToS by being a Warez group
> (generally related to size and number of attachments),
Ok, we have very few attachments. So far, so good.
> if we're too active for their tastes,
Heh, that one kills me. TOO active? WTF?
> or if they reach
> a certain number of complaints to their automated
> service (at which point they automatically kill the list).
Well, here's hoping no-one complains...
Received on Wed Oct 30 2002 - 19:02:41 CST