--- In SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com, "nehumanuscrede
<nehumanuscrede_at_y...>" <nehumanuscrede_at_y...> wrote:
> *BIG SMILE*
>
> That IS the idea. . . . . :)
You are evil in your quest to wipe out every fanboy in existence.
(Stanislovski moment) How could you?!?
>
>
>
>
> --- In SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com, "Gary <gwhalen@m...>"
> <gwhalen_at_m...> wrote:
> > --- In SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com, "nehumanuscrede
> > <nehumanuscrede_at_y...>" <nehumanuscrede_at_y...> wrote:
> > > Just an FYI. . . .
> > >
> > > Softimage has released the demo version of their flagship
package
> > > Softimage XSI v3.1
> > >
> > > It has a lot of limitations built into it, ( limited render
size,
> > > watermarks, proprietary save formats, no exports, etc. etc. )
but
> > if
> > > you are interested in playing with one of the top of the line
3D
> > > animation systems, you might want to check it out. It is the
> demo
> > > version of the same system I am attempting to model Desiree
with.
> > >
> > > I am still working on it :)
> > >
> > > You can find it at the following URL.
> > >
> > > http://www.softimage.com/products/exp/v3/
> >
> > Good God man, are you crazy? Jim's artwork is ralistic enough
> without
> > having to resort to 3D. It boggles the mind to think what the
girls
> > would look like rendered in 3D. Not to mention the hardcore
stuff.
> > Fanboys would be keeling over left and right, depending on which
> hand
> > they use. It's your call Jim.
Received on Sat Feb 15 2003 - 18:39:07 CST