"ratlord_99" <TEtteler_at_aol.com> wrote on 10/15/03 4:10:49 PM:
>
>So far I thought that Lee is Lee and Hardiman is Hardiman. Their
>artwork might be similar, but not the same if you look really close
>to it. Why should Hardiman draw pictures under 2 pseudonymns. That
>wouldn't make sense.
>
Now, that's enough... It sounds like you are turning into one of those revisionist jackasses who say the
moon isn't real, or the Holocaust was a hoax. Don't believe me? Look at
http://www.skadi.net and see
what kind of crockery those racist meatballs are coming up with.
I've seen the art of Jim and Des myself. Jim's work focuses more on detail, Des' work forcuses on
tooniness, with sweeping exaggerated strokes. They definitely could possibly have not come from the
same person. I don't think Jim can be that deceitful.
Received on Thu Oct 16 2003 - 02:23:10 CDT