--- Rhudi <rhudi_at_charter.net> wrote:
> I agree completely about "water marking" being such a
> horrible crappy idea. *sheesh* At least we're not dogs!
Agree with the watermarking issue. If you used a true
invisible water mark that was on paper prints and was only
visible if scanned, then this may work, or I have seen some
water marks that that only come out when printed, to slow
circulation in undesired means. But to 'damage' your
artwork I agree does not make sense. :-(
I think you'll be paraphrase quoted by me in the future
Rhudi! That's a great line.
"Water marking is a horrible idea - we're not dogs!" -
Rhudi.
And like a friend of mine said back in the early 80's; "If
you can read it, you can write it." So in regard to if you
can see the pic, there are even HARDWARE solutions you can
use to capture it. Print screen in Windows is even
remarkably effective for a low-tech answer... :-/
Scrapper, Black Dragon, wanting to become a sufficiently
good artist that people _want_ to 'steal' his artwork.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Received on Thu Mar 10 2005 - 17:22:25 CST