Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Okay, folks, I need some input on this...

From: Dane Hosley <Daneasaur_at_msn.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 00:20:26 -0700


I have to agree with you Jim. I suggest that you keep using what you have been using in order to prevent such acts of thievery. I have a strong feeling that the people who were complaining about the type of paper you have been using are one in the same as the people who are trying to rip you off and scan it.

Is free stuff cool? Yeah, but I sure as hell don't demand that I get anything.

Don't give in to such demands.

Stay safe unless you want to risk such ass thieves.

-Daneasaur_at_msn.com
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Take a wild, friggin guess
  To: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 10:00 PM
  Subject: [SkunkworksAMA] Okay, folks, I need some input on this...


    I recently received an e-mail from Second Ed stating that some of
  the folks who are buying my artwork from him are less than happy with
  the kind of paper it is being printed on now. For those of you who
  do not know, the paper I'm using for my folios costs about 45 bucks a
  ream, a cost which I have not passed on to either Ed or to the
  consumer. The paper is a very pale grey/offwhite stock which
  incorporates a certain safety feature: any attempt to scan or copy
  the image will result in the text "COPY COPY COPY" appearing all over
  the picture.
    Now, why did I decide to use that paper? Because of pathetic
  little shitbags who think it's totally okay to post unauthorized high-
  resolution scans of an artist's work online. People who run their
  little art-pirating sites are quickly becoming a weed that needs to
  be plucked.
    Having been the victim of such activities more times than I can
  count, I can honestly say I understand why some artists just pack up
  their bags and call it quits. And I won't lie, there were more than
  a few times when I was standing at that doorway myself. But I like
  what I draw, and (excluding those few pathetic ass-ticks who pirate
  stuff) I like the fandom and all the folks in it. I would feel it
  would be akin to a betrayal if I were to do something like calling it
  quits. That's not really what I want to do. But I have to do
  something to stem the illegal duplication and redistribution of my
  artwork.
    There seems to be a little clique in the fandom of folks who think
  they are entitled to furry artwork (or anything, really) simply
  because they want it. The only thing these individuals are entitled
  to is a mouthful of broken teeth. Obviously, they fail to realize
  that it takes a lot of time, effort and money to make a single
  drawing, let alone something as large as a portfolio. Those markers
  I use? Those sons-of-bitches are 4 bucks EACH. One marker may last
  as much as 3 pictures. Those pencils? A buck-twenty-five each. So
  if I need to stock up on, let's say, 20 pencils and 20 markers,
  that's about 110 dollars just for supplies (not including paper, ink
  pens, erasers, etcetera). Add that to the regular monthly bills, and
  the $430 worth of medicine I must now buy every month, and you can
  see why I might get a little miffed about someone posting
  unauthorized copies all over the place. I'm not made of money, and I
  haven't won the lottery. In fact, I filed Chapter 7 bankruptcy back
  in December because of massive debt due to medical bills and loans.
  So obviously, greenbacks are not falling out of my ass.
    Now, some of these customers have stated they won't buy any more
  folios if I continue to print on the special paper. It's possible
  they don't know WHY I'm using that paper. That's definitely a
  possibility. I do not want to upset anyone, or lose any customers.
  But I also do not want to have art pirates posting high-resolution
  scans of brand-new material online. It's been several months since
  the Skunkworks Animated folio came out, and I haven't seen any
  unauthorized scans. Ditto with Better Mousetrap.
    I feel that if I back down and change back to standard stock, it
  will appear as if the entire situation is motivated by money. And
  it's not. I draw what I draw because I like to draw it. Plain and
  simple. Do I expect to become rich off drawing furry art? No.
  Would I still draw it even if I were no longer selling it or posting
  it? Yes. Do I want my artwork all over the place? Not really. And
  don't give me the "Well, if it's posted online, it's fair game"
  bullshit. That remark is gonna lead to a need for massive dental
  reconstruction.
    I do not have the money or the lawyers or whatever that folks like
  Jeremy Bernal have to go after art pirates. Personally, I'd prefer
  to beat those guilty of such activities with a lead pipe, but there
  are laws against that sort of thing. So I do the next best thing:
  make it as hard as possible for someone to illegally distribute my
  artwork. Stop them before they start, so to speak.
    Now, the only way someone would notice the special watermarking is
  if they tried to scan the pictures into their computer. Otherwise,
  the text is extremely faint. You have to be pretty much on top of
  the picture in order to even detect it. So maybe some of those folks
  were trying to make digital copies of the artwork. They sounds very
  legit. I know some people who do that, so I don't doubt the
  possibility. It's always a good idea to have a "back up copy".
  Unfortunately, there's no way to produce a kind of paper that will
  allow "legitimate copying" while stemming the flow of "illegal
  redistribution".
    So, in short, I'd like to know what you folks think about this
  situation. I can guarantee if I come out with another folio on
  standard stock, it's gonna be less than a month before it shows up
  online in it's entirety. And at this point in my life, I've had it
  with some of these 90-pound weaklings behaving as if they're 7 years
  old, hiding behind a computer screen and making it their life mission
  to make other people's lives a little more hellish. I'm pretty much
  at the point where I think these particular folks need to be stopped,
  and I don't much care about the method used. They're ripping off a
  lot of good people, and that just doesn't sit well with me.
    Again, your input on this would be very much appreciated. The copy-
  protected paper is the least troublesome method I could think of to
  keep things moving along at a nice smooth pace. If you have any
  other ideas, please post them here or e-mail me directly.
    Thanks for your time and for listening to me vent...

  --JMH, not willing to let "the other side" win...





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

    a.. Visit your group "SkunkworksAMA" on the web.
      
    b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     SkunkworksAMA-unsubscribe_at_yahoogroups.com
      
    c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thu Jan 19 2006 - 01:15:47 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:52:10 CST