Re: Copy proof paper

From: winnmee <winnmee_at_yahoo.de>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 18:36:53 -0000

--- In SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com, "Kody Boen" <HSJadeFalcon@...>
wrote:
>
> Wait a minute, whats this all about? Sorry I usually don't pay
attention but
> this caught my attention, whats up?
>
>
> >From: "zavarian416a6" <zavarian416a6_at_...>
> >Reply-To: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
> >To: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: [SkunkworksAMA] Copy proof paper
> >Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 19:23:58 -0000
> >
> >I am catching -up on my E-mails and agree completely with the others i
> >have read. YOU JMH are doing that which is YOUR PERFECT RIGHT TO DO
> >and you keep on do as you see fit. Zav P.S. The ones
> >Complaining are most likely the art priates.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
I never said anything here... so Hi :P

I just want to add something too. At first I didn't like the idea of
copyproof paper for Jim's prints. I mean the sample Jim posted here
was really disturbing in my eyes. But it is all Jims decision, it is
his artwork!
Now I just bought "A Better Mousetrap" and "Skunkworks Animated" from
Second Ed.
All I can say: in real, the paper doesn't look bad at all. The visible
effect from the word "copy" is minimum. Of course, if you want to scan
it, it is disturbing as hell.
But if you've got the prints, why the hell should you scan it???
Received on Mon Feb 06 2006 - 10:37:04 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:52:11 CST