Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: Dez Rant on FurAffinity

From: Ross Sauer <archae_at_charter.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:10:33 -0600


Not all.

"fchan" has some strict moderators there, and a Do Not Post list.
And they ENFORCE that list.

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: khris_kazeras0
  To: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 4:58 PM
  Subject: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: Dez Rant on FurAffinity


  Well Lulz is a hopeless case, in fact all the furry imageboards are.
  Many of those who post on them just happen to be braindead and are
  hopeless cases themselves.

  --- In SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com, "Ross Sauer" <archae_at_...>
  wrote:
>
> They are still even worse at LULZ.net, the original "target" of
  Des' rant.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: jeremy
> To: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 6:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Dez Rant on FurAffinity
>
>
>
> at least they posted the original pic..and not the edited
  version like at onechan..which i have totally stopped
  visiting..nothing but a bunch of retards there..
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: ken_cougr
> To: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 9:16 AM
> Subject: [SkunkworksAMA] Dez Rant on FurAffinity
>
>
> I might have missed something, but did this person have
  permission to
> post Dez's Furry Rant on FurAffinity?
> http://www.furaffinity.net/view/269280/
>



   
Received on Tue Oct 31 2006 - 15:11:40 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:52:14 CST