Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: How's this for a cat? (Skunk-related)
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: M. Mitchell Marmel <
marmelmm_at_comcast.net
>
Date
: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 05:04:17 -0500
At 1:10 PM -0700 4/19/07, George McMullen wrote:
>Don't be nasty... I wouldn't just call it "Skunk"... he or she would
>be called "Stinky" xDDD
I'd like a pet armadillo, myself. Train him to roll up on command
and carry him around in a bowling ball bag.
He'd be named "Brunswick," naturally. :D
-MMM-
Received on
Fri Apr 20 2007 - 03:06:27 CDT
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Jonathan: "Re: How's this for a cat? (Skunk-related)"
Previous message
:
Scrapper Black Dragon: "Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: How's this for a cat? (Skunk-related)"
In reply to
:
George McMullen: "Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: How's this for a cat? (Skunk-related)"
Next in thread
:
George McMullen: "[SkunkworksAMA] - Strange Pets - (originally - Re: How's this for a cat? (Skunk-related))"
Reply
:
George McMullen: "[SkunkworksAMA] - Strange Pets - (originally - Re: How's this for a cat? (Skunk-related))"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.3.1
: Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:52:17 CST