--- On Tue, 23/9/08, J Hooten <jhooten_at_binary.net> wrote:
>I am quite happy to hear that. So much furry art is thinly furred
>humans. Very rarely does an artist try to figure out how an anthro
>should look.
>
Agree; 'cat girls' as I refer them, humans with ears, tail and a few feline details, don't really fall into my preferred perception of anthros, other than they border on being zoo-morphic.
> many artists dont seem to know that the tail is part of the spine...
>
Yes, extremely irksome! Seriously, what do people think it joins to??? I've had people say "that's too low on her back, that's almost in her anus...". Well, if you compare where the spine goes compared to the anus, you'll see they are right next door. Considering the size of the picture, yes, that would look very close to the same spot. If you look at the Lori's ass pics or similar, you'll see what I mean - it isn't far away!
>its obvious why they dont do more than fuzzy humans.
>Of course I like those too, when they are well done.
>
People draw what they know, hence they tend to default back to humans. Use references - Google is fantastic for finding a picture so you can see how things go! There is no shame in 'checking against the original'!
Scrapper, Black Dragon, lots of practise required to gain familiarity!
Make the switch to the world's best email. Get Yahoo!7 Mail!
http://au.yahoo.com/y7mail
Received on Wed Sep 24 2008 - 20:36:58 CDT