I'd like to point that if an entire group were gay, that it should be
viewed as a negative image of that group.
Unless you need to interact with someone's sexuality, you don't need
to know or ask about their sexuality imo.
--- In SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com, "q_eco" <q_eco@...> wrote:
>
> News Flash: Anti-Scan paper is easily defeated. I will not explain how
> to do it, but I was wondering if it was as safe as everyone thought.
> The answer is no, it's not that safe. The good news is you have to buy
> the work first before you can set it up. If Jim or Des wants to know
> more, please send me a message to that extent.
>
>
> About Fandom: Ok, after spending an unhealthy amount of time reviewing
> what's out there (MTV and the BBC special are the worst) the media
> smelled an easy mark. What the fandom needs is Des. Des if you read
> this, don't give up. Get vocal instead. What the fandom needs is a
> single person that is willing to speak on behalf of the Furs. To do
> that, we need a bunch of furs to back that single person. The issue of
> fur-dom is that everyone thinks we are all gay, or pedophiles or other
> negative images. A single person who is always willing to speak for us
> would do much. Yes we are a large group with out any reference points
> like the Trekkies or the Star Wars, but we can establish things that
> we ARE and AREN'T. We just need a loud person to do it. Let people see
> that it's not all about sex and that not every fur is a child hungry
> predator or even that all of us are gay. We need someone to say things
> like that fireman down the block, he's a fur. The middle school
> teacher who works with mentally unstable kids? She's a Scaley. That is
> what we need. (In case you are wondering, I'm a fur and I am a
> Security Officer for some of the expensive areas in S. Florida.)
>
>
> Furgonomics: I have read all these posts, and it's time to say enough.
> To do this fast and correct, you'd need to first set the needed
> parameters. An example is: How would a Shark~fur use a handgun? Well,
> before we even attempt to answer that question, we should make sure
> that there are even shark~furs in this world.
> So to make furgonomics more helpful to Jim, I suggest we, the
> community figure out what is available in his world. With that out of
> the way, we can compartmentalize everything else and move on to the
> next thing of animals VS humans. (Example: Perfume would have to be
> different due to a majority of animals having better sense of smell.)
> After that get logistical. Things like size variations and digit
> counts. Here's some weak boil downs cause I have to run.
> -Work, Home, School, Public
> -Computers, TV's and Cell phones (Standard size for all, adaptions for
> others: Example: A mouse using a computer would not need an adaption,
> but a horse would. Either the keyboard would be bigger <waste of
> resources> or more likely there would be a "mitt" that would fit over
> the hand that has littler nubs at the tips to better hit the single
keys)
> -Etiquette, personal care, social influence
>
> Ok, that's it from me for a bit.
> I hope it helps.
>
> ~Q~
>
Received on Sat Oct 04 2008 - 17:57:08 CDT