>"Ross Sauer" wrote"
>You forgot "Omaha The Cat Dancer."
Ooh...I think that violates a federal law...forgetting Omaha.
Interesting, This groups postings is a faded mirror
reflection of what was going on in the late '70s between
Reed Waller and the other artist back then about adding
explicit sex into the funny animal genre. Some argue, to
a certain degree, "Omaha" saved the underground funny
animal "furry" genre from disappearing all together;
And yet, folks were repulsed by it, and I do mean sicken
by it. What Reed and others introduced pushed Vootie over
the edge and the artist split into fractions - but now,
drawing those old 'normal' sex-themes has exploded to
include sexual fetishes that were never imagined back
in the '70s.(Well, In real life they were, just not well
known in drawings as funny animals. Very explicit artwork
goes back hundreds of centuries to when man,(and woman?)
picked up a chunk of charcoal. And I do mean explicit
and far-out. O_o.)
The Big Bang concept of expansion is working well in the
funny animal genre.
Can anything be done about all the different sexual themes
being drawn now?
Nope.
Maybe, The question is being framed wrong.
Human nature is human nature.
(Speaking of human nature - Jim and Des needs to draw more porn.)
Received on Sat Jun 06 2009 - 23:42:33 CDT