No lifers is more likely.
--- On Mon, 6/22/09, Take a wild, friggin guess <a_change_of_plans_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Take a wild, friggin guess <a_change_of_plans_at_yahoo.com>
Subject: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: New file uploaded to SkunkworksAMA
To: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, June 22, 2009, 11:08 PM
--- In SkunkworksAMA_at_ yahoogroups. com, spudugly_at_... wrote:
>
>
> I'm just glad you didn't put cameltoes on the girls..."Cubworks" was disturbing enough without them.
> It's my least favorite of the spoof-'folios, but then, I find cub stuff in general to be extremely repulsive.?
>
>
Yeah, I was careful about drawing that one, although the second version (drawn after this one) came out much better than this concept sketch. The final version was inked by Ms. Troublemaker, and she added a few changes (like shorter shorts, tops, and the whole anime-looking facial deal). Still pretty risque, and dangerously close to the "no-go" zone as far as I'm concerned. I heard someone edited the picture so they were nude. I hope that person gets the fastest-growing, most lethal disease in the world. Oh, wait. They already have that. It's called "stupidity". ;P
Not a fan of "cub" myself, so you're not alone in that regard. Some folks might argue that I drew a few pictures of the girls at younger ages (the three toddler pictures, and the one where Val is feeding Onyx and Natasha, while Lori looks at her milk bottle with disgust), but I hardly think that's "cub". Hell, even the character "Penance" isn't "cub", although her story skirts the issue.
I think some folks just look for a way to create drama. If none exists, they'll make up false associations and start the ball a-rolling. Sad.
--JMH
Received on Tue Jun 23 2009 - 17:34:50 CDT