On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Take a wild, friggin guess <
a_change_of_plans_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> --- In SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com <SkunkworksAMA%40yahoogroups.com>,
> spudugly_at_... wrote:
> >
> >
> > I'm just glad you didn't put cameltoes on the girls..."Cubworks" was
> disturbing enough without them.
> > It's my least favorite of the spoof-'folios, but then, I find cub stuff
> in general to be extremely repulsive.?
>
>
> Yeah, I was careful about drawing that one, although the second version
> (drawn after this one) came out much better than this concept sketch. The
> final version was inked by Ms. Troublemaker, and she added a few changes
> (like shorter shorts, tops, and the whole anime-looking facial deal). Still
> pretty risque, and dangerously close to the "no-go" zone as far as I'm
> concerned. I heard someone edited the picture so they were nude. I hope that
> person gets the fastest-growing, most lethal disease in the world. Oh, wait.
> They already have that. It's called "stupidity". ;P
>
> Not a fan of "cub" myself, so you're not alone in that regard. Some folks
> might argue that I drew a few pictures of the girls at younger ages (the
> three toddler pictures, and the one where Val is feeding Onyx and Natasha,
> while Lori looks at her milk bottle with disgust), but I hardly think that's
> "cub". Hell, even the character "Penance" isn't "cub", although her story
> skirts the issue.
>
I know that pic; it sure ain't "cub" and it's funny as hell! And I'm the
guy who favors pedophiles being dropped live into an incinerator, then
having a pizza party.
BondoFox
www.bondofox.net
Received on Fri Jun 26 2009 - 10:38:35 CDT