Why is an invisible screaming unicorn any less believable than a ghost?
Maybe they just can't see the unicorn because it's invisible. Maybe it’s
invisible and dressed like a ghost?
-----Original Message-----
From: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com [mailto:SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Zach Collins (Siege)
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 9:23 PM
To: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: Paranormal stuff, waaaay off-topic.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Andrew Greene<blaze_at_speakeasy.net> wrote:
>
> Maybe they’re paranormal raccoons? Why assume it’s ghosts? Couldn’t we
> assume it’s an invisible unicorn just as well?
Maybe because even the psychics don't tend to see invisible unicorns
that scream?
--
Zach Collins
"If code can be speech, then software can be art."
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
Received on Wed Aug 12 2009 - 18:41:01 CDT