so its about, natural size, that'll depend on the bra size of the speices?
(crap my spelling needs work)
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM, jmhcustomart2004 <
a_change_of_plans_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> --- In SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com <SkunkworksAMA%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "inkwell_01" <inkwell_01_at_...> wrote:
> >
> > Determining The Trios figure measurements will be a
> > tad tricky.
> >
> > Jim never created any model sheet turn-abouts for the
> > characters physical attributes.
> >
> > Jim draws the poses as he sees them in his mind, hence,
> > the physical attributes are sized more to the content
> > of a particular drawing - not a constant set size carried
> > over from drawing to drawing; this causes a wide variation
> > as to the real size of any physical part.
> >
> > You have to use a number of the girls folios to get an
> > average of the girls 3D dimensions.
> >
> > With a height of around 4 1/2 feet, the girls are quite
> > small, circa, human kid age around 9 or 10; however Jim
> > didn't draw them as small children. It's not a human kid
> > body with a cartoon animal head stuck on top; But there
> > are enough similarities to use the human system to get
> > a rough idea of the girls figure measurements.
> >
> > A preliminary study was done long ago on Natasha which
> > points to a bust size just shy of 38D. I think her waist-hip
> > ratio was around 0.6. (Close to the 0.7 ideal ratio.) The
> > numbers need to be rechecked.
> >
> > Anyway, the new character design might change the
> > whole figure attribute set of the girls. (Jim can updates
> > us on that.)
> >
>
> Yeah, the new redesigns will change their figures a bit (but not much). The
> trio is between 4' 5" and 4' 6" (Lori). When standing still, they stand
> straight up, and on the full of the foot. When walking, they stand on their
> toes, but lean forward. Despite shifting forward, their height remains
> nearly the same (factoring in the additional height of the extended foot).
>
> Bear in mind, these characters have fur-covered bodies. Depending upon the
> thickness and layering of the fur, they may appear to have larger
> measurements than they actually have. Fur would make the breasts seem larger
> than they actually are, as well as making the hips or waist appear
> different. I'm not drawing the characters as if they are colored human
> forms, with no distinct fur texturing or anything. The black fur on the
> trio's bodies' is coarser than the white fur, which would have a softer,
> fluffier texture to it. Many species would have different densities of fur
> in the same region, too.
>
> Here's another reason why it would be tricky to determine something like
> bra size; all the different species are different sizes. Humans are fairly
> similar. They don't range from 4 feet to 10 feet in height. As an example,
> Koth (Onika's ancestor) is 3' 2". That's about as tall as the average
> doorknob. Onika is about the height of a 6-year olgirl. While her breasts
> might appear large on her form, they wouldn't be very big when compared to a
> 9-foot-tall Clydesdale. There's too much scale difference to be able to
> easily categorize such measurements, I think...
>
> --JMH
>
>
>
Received on Wed Sep 02 2009 - 20:26:00 CDT