Re: [SkunkworksAMA] New file uploaded to SkunkworksAMA

From: Rick Pikul <chakatfirepaw_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:58:23 -0500

On Saturday 20 February 2010 22:20, David Ewell wrote:
> Definitly Terrie Smith.  So true about the wet fur not being 'painted on'
> as depicted in the first panel not to mention all the loose fur that would
> choke the drains.   So damn true.

The fur+shower problems do have some solutions, the three big ones being:

Furries are likely to not need to clean their entire bodies as often as
humans, this reduces the amount of shampoo used to a more reasonable amount.

Much of the fur that would otherwise be shed in the shower is dealt with by
brushing/combing.

Easily cleaned fur traps for the fur that does come off in the shower,
possibly combined with wider drains.


As for the drooping wet fur look, that is strongly influenced by both the type
and length of fur. Otter look fine wet, as do short-hair breeds of dog, OTOH
a snow leopard is not going to do so well.

-- 
		Chakat Firepaw - Inventor & Scientist (Mad) 
Received on Sun Feb 21 2010 - 11:59:11 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:52:38 CST