Wow, the issues keep coming, Tom.
>I'm sure that there are a number of people I encountered who have
homosexual proclivities and I never find out >because it never comes up.
There are plenty of Jews, Mormons, etc. out there and you don't necessarily
find out that >about them. (P. S. None of the Jews I ever met have had huge
noses.)
So if it never comes up, what're you so worried about? And, I've known
plenty of jews with big noses. Many of my relatives are jews with big
noses. And what's with 'Homosexual proclivities'? Why not just say
'homosexual'? There IS such a thing as bisexuality, yanno.
>> > As for people experimenting with homosexuality, I've yet to meet anyone
who
>> > has tried it that weren't already established homosexuals in the first
>> > place.
>>
>> I've bumped into more than a few people who have tried it simply for the
>> experience.
>I have never tried homosexuality, considering that I don't like
proctological examinations, and there's still AIDS out >there even if it's
currently out of the news media. I'm sure there are more people out there
who have had sex with the >family pet-if for no reason other than the family
pet won't talk. If someone has sex with another of the same gender >without
definite homosexual proclivities to begin with, the sex is either
nonconsensual (rape or prostitution) or the >person is unable to find a sex
partner of the opposite gender.
First of all, by your reckoning, to be an established homosexual, you have
to have homosexual sex, so how does one 'try it' and yet be an established
homosexual, whatever the hell that means? Circular argument: see circular
argument.
Second of all, what does homosexuality have to do with proctological exams?
Presumably you aren't against anal sex, or you wouldn't be on the SKUNKWORKS
news group. Jim draws a bunch of it. Yeah, there's still AIDS out there,
and gay sex is an increasingly bad way to get it. Most new AIDS infections
are of heterosexuals. Gays got the news in the 80's, for the most part.
Now you compare homosexuality to bestiality, which shows that you not only
have personal issues, but you're also kind of weird. Perhaps you are a
member of a religious organization or culture that condemns homosexuality.
I have news for you. They probably wouldn't like the fact that you look at
pictures of naked animal chicks as you masturbate, either.
Then you claim that non-gays that have gay sex do it nonconsensually, or are
raped. Issues again. I've had sex with a number of bisexual men, and a few
who were clearly straight. Why did they do it? Because either 1) they were
very good friends, or 2) because sex feels good! Sex feels good, and
bisexuality doubles your chances of getting a date. The idea that gays
can't find partners of the opposite sex is kind of silly. Before I came
out, I dated heavily. I lived with two women, concurrently. I lived, at one
point, with two women and another man in a foursome. It was
overcompensation on my part, a common response to discovering that one is
gay, but being unable to admit it to one's self. Looking back, my bisexual
phase was a LOT of fun. I've had several long-term boyfriends, and I've
settled down with the current one, who can be seen on my FA page, for those
of you who are curious.
In closing, let me point out that if homosexuality is so uncommon, why is so
much straight porn focused on gay acts? When they show a blowjob, you get
extreme close-ups of cocksucking, with lots of cock and lots of mouth. They
don't concentrate on the actor's expression. They don't generally film it
from his point of view. It's all cock, and all mouth. Anal sex in porn is
just as bad, lots of close-ups of cock plunging into ass, gaping ass,
cum-splashed ass and huge cocks in close-up. Why all the lesbian stuff?
Long Tom.
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2870 - Release Date: 05/13/10
14:26:00
Received on Fri May 14 2010 - 09:18:35 CDT