Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: question

From: Not Disclosed <knot_disclosed_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:05:41 -0700 (PDT)


there is no reason that cats could not play the flute. They would just have to use the pads of there fingers rather then there claws, and the claws on most anthros would get in the way of that type of instrument anyway so why pick on cats? huh, well huh, can you tell me that?




>________________________________
>From: Scott W. Diller <ford_p42_at_yahoo.com>
>To: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 9:27 PM
>Subject: Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: question
>
>

>*imagines inbred cats picking dueling banjos*
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
>From: Rhudprrt <rhudiprrt_at_gmail.com>
>To: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Thu, April 28, 2011 4:43:02 PM
>Subject: RE: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: question
>

>My favorite supposition has been what musical instruments any anthro furries could play.  For example, a feline couldn’t play a flute, but with the claws could be a killer banjo picker.

>From:SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com [mailto:SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Zach Collins (Siege)
>Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 10:29 AM
>To: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: question


>Dolphins, apes, parrots... I'm sure continued testing will prove that
>the only real difference is how we talk and how many layers our brains
>have.
>
>On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Brandon <payne_brandon_at_yahoo.ca> wrote:
>>
>>
>> --- In SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com, "jmhcustomart2004" <a_change_of_plans_at_...> wrote:
>>>
>>> I highly doubt it.  Even if the science was up to the task, you'd have to deal with groups who would state it's against religion/against science/against better judgment, whatever.  If we humans cannot even get along with our own kind, do you really think we'd get along with another sentient species?  Our own nature condemns us
 and limits us, I'm afraid.
>>>
>>> --JMH
>>
>> So true. Specism will not only end up becoming legitimate, but even surpass racism in its potential for genocide because we humans have an extremely strong tendency to prioritize our feelings (feelings of a lesser nature get pushed back by a greater feeling) and may even see them as a greater competition than other humans. The result is a member of the KKK or neo-nazis comparing a Black human to a non-human sapient with something like "they may be a n****r, but at least they're human."
>>
>> Yet there is also a tendency for good to come out of evil. We humans currently take ourselves for granted because we are the only sapient creatures on Earth and the presence of non-human biological sapience might end up making us see ourselves more clearly as human, thus reducing interhuman racism.
>>
>> -Brandon Payne
>>
>>
>>
>>
 ------------------------------------
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>--
>Zach Collins
>http://twitter.com/strikingdragon
>http://siege.livejournal.com
>
>
>
Received on Fri Apr 29 2011 - 19:19:46 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:52:44 CST