Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: question

From: David Ewell <kuchadude1_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 17:10:55 -0700 (PDT)


Both are good reasons I agree with.


From: jmhcustomart2004 <a_change_of_plans_at_yahoo.com>
To: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:31 AM
Subject: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: question


 


--- In mailto:SkunkworksAMA%40yahoogroups.com, Not Disclosed <knot_disclosed_at_...> wrote:
>
> Well she's damn good and so is Jim, thus I would like to see
> anything they do not just their Furry stuff...

Unfortunately, because there are folks in the fandom with axes to grind, I keep my anthropomorphic artwork very separate from my "regular" artwork. I don't need someone connecting the two, as that would be potentially bad for business. As such, the likelihood of me ever posting my mainstream stuff on any sort of "furry" forum or image board is pretty slim.

And, as has been shown in years past, things sent through private e-mails to "close acquaintances" do not always remain so private. Surely you've heard stories of artists who suddenly discover that artwork they sent to a select few people was now being posted on public image boards?

--JMH
Received on Wed Jul 25 2012 - 18:33:00 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:52:46 CST