Re: [SkunkworksAMA] New file uploaded to SkunkworksAMA

From: DOPR Dragon <dopr5dragon_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:42:03 -0700


I'm waiting to see if/when the other shoe drops (as the saying goes).

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Cheetah <cheetah_at_jabarchives.com> wrote:

> **
>
>
> Actually I never handed Jim a script he objected to.. Not once.. not even
> an idea… Everyone was just use to what V.Kyrie did in script SHE wrote..
> the “sticking to the bed” stuff and all that was NOT scripted by me.. So
> please don’t lump me in there with objectionable material.. and Half of
> Jim’s actually objection where because it was a split world with humans,
> where the human moral code (or lack thereof) could attempt to surface or be
> used as an argument. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Cheetah****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com [mailto:
> SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Kit Parenteau
> *Sent:* Monday, October 29, 2012 11:42 AM
> *To:* SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: [SkunkworksAMA] New file uploaded to SkunkworksAMA****
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
> Oh, I never said he was going to swing back, just that this is a far swing
> from the prior work. It's fully his right to discontinue the furry work.
> Given what he's gone through in the past decade plus, honestly I don't
> blame him if he wants to. Des discontinued furry a long while ago. Jim
> has been focusing primarily on his main income artwork.
>
> When doing CnC, he objected to some of the content he was asked to draw,
> so it didn't happen the way the comic normally would have been. You have
> to admit, really, the fandom has some serious sickos in it and so the CnC
> stuff he objected to is likely the tip of the iceberg.
>
> If the group is here explicitly to suck up and fap to new work from him,
> then likely it won't survive. If it's here to discuss or handle old work,
> archive, or other such things, then it might. I do suspect the former
> though.
>
>
> On 10/29/2012 9:32 AM, Larry Barron wrote:****
>
> Trust me... this is NOT "normal" he is having some issue/s and wishes to
> kill off this line of work... I personally wonder how long the group will
> last after this. ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Kit Parenteau <kitfoxen_at_gmail.com> <kitfoxen_at_gmail.com>
> *To:* SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
> *Sent:* Monday, October 29, 2012 10:53 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [SkunkworksAMA] New file uploaded to SkunkworksAMA****
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
> He got kind of burnt out on the porn from what I understand.
>
> A swing like this is completely reasonable, especially for somebody with
> such exacting technical skill.
>
> On 10/29/2012 7:35 AM, Lyle K wrote:****
>
> Geez, Jim....****
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
>
>
Received on Mon Oct 29 2012 - 14:25:26 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:52:46 CST