Hey all!
Okay, so being new here I'm going to be asking all sorts of questions and stuff, which it seems isn't a bad thing. There are a few lags and so on in the forum topics, and while that might be due to RL getting in peoples' way of their pursuit of all things good and furry, I figure I'd also shake things up! Besides I really like talking to all of you and getting your input in the how's and why's! Especially as everyone has been so totally cool and nice and willing to share their opinions and thoughts! Again, thanks for letting me in to play!
I know, leave it to a girl to mess up the boys' club, right? ;)
This is a rather naughty topic, and while directed to those that can draw, I'd love to hear from all of you!
So, Jim and friends, today's topic is one of my favorite subjects, and that would be...(drum roll, please!)...penises!
When doing naughty drawings, do you prefer to put more human phalluses on your anthropomorphic males, or do you go with something that is more in line with their mundane (non-anthro) base animal's? Why? What appeals more?
I know a lot of the female furry writers I've talked to are evenly split on whether they have their male characters equipped with human or animal like genitals, though a substantial proportion of said female writers seem to be preoccupied with the concept of the canine 'knot'. Plus I've found that this preference for one type of organ is normally associated with the character either being sheathed or exposed.
While nature has shown that in RL a male will adapt to accommodate the female (as it should be ;)) what are the preferences of the artists like you, Jim, and any others out there that like to draw, paint, etc;?
Now, from a gal's perspective, I can tell you that I would honestly prefer exposed genitalia over sheathed. Hygiene is the primary concern, and, sorry for being a little graphic here, but the thought of going down on Rover's-slimy-red-rocket just doesn't quite get me all happy and revved up, though coitus wouldn't be as difficult.
And just so you guys know, yes, a lot of chicks dig porn, too, it's just that for the most part we aren't as visually attenuated to things, preferring a good story where our own imaginations can fill in all the sordid little details!
I am curious, though, about this phenomena with the Mighty-Male-Meat conundrum. I know that Jay Naylor, a good artist in his own right, even if he does focus more on the genitalia than limbs, has done a number of illustrations with both, though lately it seems as if he is geared more towards male equipment based on the mundane animal his characters are based on.
That, and wouldn't it stand to reason that females that are of the same species would have corresponding vaginal characteristics? Possibly lack of external stimulation points (i.e. the clitoris) with sexual gratification being more of an internal aspect that would follow more of a procreation angle over recreation, though on the other side we have witnessed that the more advanced the animal in question by way of intelligence, the more likely the engagement of sexual activity for the sheer pleasure. Think porpoises and the like.
And I apologize beforehand for making some out there think...it really is a bad habit of mine!
Lily =^.^=
Received on Tue Jul 23 2013 - 11:27:15 CDT