Screwing each others socks off, LOL! Good one, Jim.
On Jul 23, 2013 7:38 PM, "jmhcustomart2004" <a_change_of_plans_at_yahoo.com>
wrote:
> **
>
>
> I generally draw my characters with similar-looking genitalia, with the
> main difference being size and/or coloration. I've always drawn the male
> and female parts on my characters as fairly humanoid, as that is one of the
> unifying factors of their ancestry. For example, there had to be SOME sort
> of outside influence to make them more evolved than their four-legged
> brethren, right? Other similarities include the general form (bipedal,
> upright), four digits on each hand and foot, eyes that are either located
> in the front of the head or halfway between the sides and front, etc.. The
> lack of knowledge about this possible common ancestor is what led to the
> creation of their religious beliefs. They didn't know, so they created an
> explanation!
>
> Personally, I find animal junk pretty nasty, though I don't go out of my
> way to look at it. I've always figured every species in our own world has
> their own unique design for a purpose; to be compatible with others of the
> same species. But in Skunkworks/Caterwaul, there are numerous species who
> can intermingle because their equipment is pretty much all the same.
> Dissimilar breeds cannot produce offspring or hybrids, so that allows
> couples who aren't the same, and who do not want kids, to be able to screw
> each other's socks off without worrying about birth control or any unwanted
> "surprises".
>
> --JMH
>
> --- In SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com, "lilykarafox" <lilykarafox_at_...>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey all!
> >
> > Okay, so being new here I'm going to be asking all sorts of questions
> and stuff, which it seems isn't a bad thing. There are a few lags and so on
> in the forum topics, and while that might be due to RL getting in peoples'
> way of their pursuit of all things good and furry, I figure I'd also shake
> things up! Besides I really like talking to all of you and getting your
> input in the how's and why's! Especially as everyone has been so totally
> cool and nice and willing to share their opinions and thoughts! Again,
> thanks for letting me in to play!
> >
> > I know, leave it to a girl to mess up the boys' club, right? ;)
> >
> > This is a rather naughty topic, and while directed to those that can
> draw, I'd love to hear from all of you!
> >
> > So, Jim and friends, today's topic is one of my favorite subjects, and
> that would be...(drum roll, please!)...penises!
> >
> > When doing naughty drawings, do you prefer to put more human phalluses
> on your anthropomorphic males, or do you go with something that is more in
> line with their mundane (non-anthro) base animal's? Why? What appeals more?
> >
> > I know a lot of the female furry writers I've talked to are evenly split
> on whether they have their male characters equipped with human or animal
> like genitals, though a substantial proportion of said female writers seem
> to be preoccupied with the concept of the canine 'knot'. Plus I've found
> that this preference for one type of organ is normally associated with the
> character either being sheathed or exposed.
> >
> > While nature has shown that in RL a male will adapt to accommodate the
> female (as it should be ;)) what are the preferences of the artists like
> you, Jim, and any others out there that like to draw, paint, etc;?
> >
> > Now, from a gal's perspective, I can tell you that I would honestly
> prefer exposed genitalia over sheathed. Hygiene is the primary concern,
> and, sorry for being a little graphic here, but the thought of going down
> on Rover's-slimy-red-rocket just doesn't quite get me all happy and revved
> up, though coitus wouldn't be as difficult.
> >
> > And just so you guys know, yes, a lot of chicks dig porn, too, it's just
> that for the most part we aren't as visually attenuated to things,
> preferring a good story where our own imaginations can fill in all the
> sordid little details!
> >
> > I am curious, though, about this phenomena with the Mighty-Male-Meat
> conundrum. I know that Jay Naylor, a good artist in his own right, even if
> he does focus more on the genitalia than limbs, has done a number of
> illustrations with both, though lately it seems as if he is geared more
> towards male equipment based on the mundane animal his characters are based
> on.
> >
> > That, and wouldn't it stand to reason that females that are of the same
> species would have corresponding vaginal characteristics? Possibly lack of
> external stimulation points (i.e. the clitoris) with sexual gratification
> being more of an internal aspect that would follow more of a procreation
> angle over recreation, though on the other side we have witnessed that the
> more advanced the animal in question by way of intelligence, the more
> likely the engagement of sexual activity for the sheer pleasure. Think
> porpoises and the like.
> >
> > And I apologize beforehand for making some out there think...it really
> is a bad habit of mine!
> >
> > Lily =^.^=
> >
>
>
>
Received on Tue Jul 23 2013 - 17:23:13 CDT