Re: Curiosity and dead kitties
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: David <
vulpine_at_mac.com
>
Date
: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:10:27 -0000
Why not trilateral? Quadralateral?
I agree that humans are conceited; they've had 10,000 years or more to grow into the belief that they are the greatest (and only intelligent) species in the Universe.
--- In SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com, Rick Pikul <chakatfirepaw@...> wrote:
>
> On Sunday 28 July 2013 05:42, Edward Fox wrote:
> > All of that talk about furries and multi-species worlds got me thinking. If
> > you really think about it humans won the evolution lottery big time. Of all
> > of the creatures that could have evolved intelligence a creature got it
> > that doesn't have either fur or a muzzle. That didn't have to be the case.
> > Now consider that intelligent life has probably evolved on worlds
> > throughout our galaxy. Are they going to look more like us or more like
> > earth's other animals? I bet a quarter that if earth is ever invited to
> > meet with representatives from a galaxy government (if one actually exists)
> > that there will be grins on the faces of the furry fans and shock on the
> > faces of everybody else. What if none of those representatives look like
> > humans? Oh the disappointment! Imagine how people would feel if they had to
> > face the simple fact that humans are not the model for all intelligent life
> > in the universe. I'd love to see that so bad that I can taste it. :)
>
> Everyone that seriously considers the possibility of there being fellow tool
> users out there has long figured out that they probably look nothing like us.
>
> And by nothing like us they seriously mean it: We aren't talking 'they don't
> look like thin-furred apes that are about 2m tall,' or even 'they don't look
> like mammals,' we're talking 'clearly not a descendant of the early tetrapods
> that predate amphibians.' At best we can expect vaguely humanoid and
> centauroid body forms to commonly develop, (bilateral symmetry plus a mix of
> grasping and motive limbs).
>
>
> Furry aliens are just as much of a authors conceit as humans with forehead
> bumps.
>
> --
> Chakat Firepaw - Inventor & Scientist (Mad)
>
Received on
Tue Jul 30 2013 - 16:14:15 CDT
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Ross Sauer: "Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: Curiosity and dead kitties"
Previous message
:
Edward Fox: "Re: Curiosity and dead kitties"
In reply to
:
Rick Pikul: "Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: Curiosity and dead kitties"
Next in thread
:
Ross Sauer: "Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: Curiosity and dead kitties"
Reply
:
Ross Sauer: "Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: Curiosity and dead kitties"
Reply
:
Larry Barron: "Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: Curiosity and dead kitties"
Reply
:
Edward Fox: "Re: Curiosity and dead kitties"
Reply
:
Rick Pikul: "Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: Curiosity and dead kitties"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.3.1
: Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:52:48 CST