As for Mores law there a bit stuck (last I heard) in finding something small enough to use to pass through the templates for the actual manufacture of the smaller circuits, HOWEVER, they MAY have come up with a way around it for a short time as they have gone 3D with there circuits making them stand on edge to squeeze more in the same amount of space (Neat idea in my opinion as I had wondered when they might that some time ago and why they could not do it...)
Count your life by smiles, not tears;
Count your age by friends, not years.
>________________________________
> From: David Ewell <kuchadude1_at_yahoo.com>
>To: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 6:41 PM
>Subject: Re: [SkunkworksAMA] RE: Re: Remember those crazy "Orangina" ads?
>
>
>
>
>No problem about having to go full moderate. If it got to that point where it had to be done then so be it.
>
>
>From: Scrapper Black Dragon <scrapperbd_at_yahoo.com>
>To: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 3:41 AM
>Subject: Re: [SkunkworksAMA] RE: Re: Remember those crazy "Orangina" ads?
>
>
>You've got to love that digital animation is at the stage where we can now blend actors and enhancements quite easily. :-) Now for when the home PC (tablet? phone?? watch???) has enough crank to allow this sort of rendering and 'enhanced reality'. I guess you could extrapolate Moore's Law for amount of power required and then multiply out till you can predict the approximate time it will be main-stream available?
>
>For those wondering why their posts may not appear immediately, it is because this group is in full-moderated mode - unless JMH or I approve a post, it will sit in a message queue.
>
>Answering other questions regarding "recent art posts", I'll say "not much" and if you look in the groups at the file dates, that will quickly show you what is new. Though having said that, I often forget some of the earlier stuff and 're-enjoy' it when going for a browse.
>
>Scrapper, Black Dragon, whose last art post was years ago. :-(
>
>----- Original Message -----
>> From: Randy Rodgers <aquafawks_at_gmail.com>
>> To: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Monday, 9 September 2013 12:29 PM
>> Subject: Re: [SkunkworksAMA] RE: Re: Remember those crazy "Orangina" ads?
>>
>> If you're referring to at the end, I'm fairly sure that's a goat,
>> not
>> a pig. I might be wrong though.
>>
>> On 9/8/13, spambucket0_at_cox.net <spambucket0_at_cox.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Ok. I'd definitely sleep with the cheetah girl. But I draw the line at
>> the
>>> pig. I wish her well but she's just not my type. Is the cheetah girl
>> single?
>>> ;)
>>>
>>>
>>> Edward Fox
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlKDu_XtG_I
>>>
>>>
>>> --- In SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com, <skunkworksama_at_yahoogroups.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlKDu_XtG_I
>>>
>>> 1:32 ....one word: rowr.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Rod
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Received on Sun Sep 15 2013 - 16:43:46 CDT