Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: Jim's auction results -- whoa

From: Ross Sauer <patch_at_bytehead.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 11:45:11 -0500

----- Original Message -----
From: Morphy
To: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: Jim's auction results -- whoa

From: <umen_orlando_at_hotmail.com>

> That's the problem most face when it comes to this kind of
> artwork. Anything with humans is certainly accepted (to a
> degree) but freely-displaying furry artwork really depends on how
> open minded both you are to doing it, and your friends are to
> seeing it.

I dunno, I've got a book written by a shrink who's not only tried to dessect
the more common base fetishes but included quite a number of pictures. When
she got to furries she has some art by Robert Hill. *^^*

Now there's some disturbing stuff, heh, food play... ponygirls (and guys)...
racing ponygirls with an attached cart(?!). And you though drawings of
furries were hard to explain to unknowning family and friends. Best to
introduce them slowly with a swath of pictures from Yerf.

Reply:

My family and friends think I'm kind of screwy because of all the furrys I
have on my walls.
I simply tell them, "It's just a charming fantasy for me, something I like
seeing on my walls, that looks better than ugly reality."
"It's a fantasy, just like the Sports Illustrated swimsuit models are a
fantasy."

And they know that I still consider it just that, fantasy.
My sisters love soap operas.
My Dad loves old westerns.
My Mom loves "family dramas."

And some of the cartoon characters, (like Minerva and Lola,) my youngest
nephews and nieces like pictures of. (Don't worry, I only give them the
pictures where they have their clothes on!) <G>
Received on Wed Oct 10 2001 - 09:42:19 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:51:17 CST