Re: ATTN: JMH (several dumb Questions O.o;)Female to Male Ratio

From: Brandon Payne <payne_brandon_at_yahoo.ca>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2001 17:21:47 -0000

--- In SkunkworksAMA_at_y..., Jason Leisemann <jkwleisemann_at_y...> wrote:
>
> --- Brandon Payne <payne_brandon_at_y...> wrote:
> > That also reminds me of something that I forgot to
> > include yesterday.
> > This would also make it a matriarchal world, since
> > the low male ratio
> > would translate into low input into that world's
> > state of affairs.
>
> Unless, of course, the low number of males meant that
> they were viewed as more important. After all, the
> most valuable resource of most societies tends to be
> rather important in said society.
>
That is a good point you make. However, they will have to end up
being careful not to get too arrogant or they could be vulnerable to
a revolution from the females (South Africa's Apartheid government
being an example).
> =====
> -----
> Jason KW Leisemann
> Furry Code:
>
> FU[Spirit Bear]hm4a/FD3fw/CWm3s A C* D H+ M P+ R+ T W Z Sm?/m++/m-
RLCT a18 c++$ d+ e+ f h+ iw++ j* p* sm--
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Find a job, post your resume.
> http://careers.yahoo.com
Received on Sat Nov 03 2001 - 09:21:51 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:51:19 CST