Re: [SkunkworksAMA] CF is not the con you are looking for?

From: <slvertyger_at_aol.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 12:32:14 EDT

In a message dated 5/1/2002 10:33:41 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
blaze_at_netaxs.com writes:


> I never realized that we'd be scanned for our furry purity at the door!
> Just how little do we have to do with furry before we get thrown out on
> our tails?
>

From what I've heard, most of the people who showed up that year just looking
for sex weren't furs AT ALL. Now take this with a grain of salt, but I heard
that that year someone put an ad for CF in the back of a gay porn mag,
claiming it was the place to get laid.

--------------------
"MythicFox", of Yiffnet, Taps, and pretty much everywhere else now that I
think of it
"Were these cosmetics tested on animals?" "Yes, and they looked _great_."
ICQ #59987211
Received on Wed May 01 2002 - 09:32:33 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:51:32 CST