Well, yes, I've heard that, too. But nobody can seem to find that ad, or
knows who put it in, if it does exist, nor can they name the paper. What
you're doing is repeating an unsubstantiated rumor, like it was truth.
On Wed, 1 May 2002 slvertyger_at_aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 5/1/2002 10:33:41 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> blaze_at_netaxs.com writes:
>
>
> > I never realized that we'd be scanned for our furry purity at the door!
> > Just how little do we have to do with furry before we get thrown out on
> > our tails?
> >
>
> >From what I've heard, most of the people who showed up that year just looking
> for sex weren't furs AT ALL. Now take this with a grain of salt, but I heard
> that that year someone put an ad for CF in the back of a gay porn mag,
> claiming it was the place to get laid.
>
> --------------------
> "MythicFox", of Yiffnet, Taps, and pretty much everywhere else now that I
> think of it
> "Were these cosmetics tested on animals?" "Yes, and they looked _great_."
> ICQ #59987211
>
>
Received on Wed May 01 2002 - 09:41:04 CDT