Re: CF is not the con you are looking for?

From: darrel_exline <darrelx_at_polarden.org>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 23:50:27 -0000

--- In SkunkworksAMA_at_y..., "sean foltz" <cigarskunk_at_h...> wrote:
> I think the dead part might be the attendence combined with the
rather
> extreme regulations put on the furs - from what I've heard, they're
even
> harsher then AC is about behavior.

Just what *have* you heard? and was that from CF Staff, or from
someone talking through their asshole?

Your statement above is the kind of rumor-mongering bullshit that
spreads without check. If you have facts, then state them. If not,
shut the hell up.

The con is not by any means "dead".
Received on Thu May 02 2002 - 16:53:47 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:51:32 CST