Re: [SkunkworksAMA] RE: Yahell on nuclear rampage against Furry groups

From: Jason Leisemann <jkwleisemann_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:10:22 -0700 (PDT)

--- iontiger <iontiger_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> If they are targeting groups for adult content,
> then they are in
> violation of the First Amendment.
> "Free speech, Free press, the right to peaceable
> assembly".
> As I understand, according to copyright law, the
> only time can a
> corporation or company go after someone for
> violating a copyright or
> patent is when that person or people are makeing
> money off of
> copywritten material or committing some form of
> piracy.

*le sigh*

Unfortunately, you've interpreted copyright law in a
way that most people do - and one that's wrong.
Technically, it's only legal if you're keeping it for
your own personal use and limited presentation - 'net
distribution is technically illegal. Now, there's a
lot of legal evidence that such material would be
determined to be fair-use if it was challenged, but
nobody has so far.

Anywho - there's also the fact that there's no
evidence that Yahoo is targetting just furry groups or
just adult groups or just copyrighted groups - Furry
Winamp Skins died, which cleared the last two easily,
and I believe several non-furry groups disappeared
too.

I have a feeling that it's more likely one of the
servers died, myself, and the data was lost.

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
Received on Fri Sep 27 2002 - 14:10:23 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:51:39 CST