At 06:05 AM 3/17/2006, you wrote:
>Not to be discouraging, but...
>9 cases have been known filed as legal action against people over furry art
>theft. 7 were thrown out, as their respective states do not uphold
>copyright on pornographic materials, and 2 resulted in the /arist/ being
>penalized, as the material was deemed inappropriate by state standards
>(under anti-obscenity acts)
List your sources. The first seven you claim breaks federal law, not state
law. As such, it shouldn't even touching state courts or state law. The
"other two" are something that any lawyer who even gained bar should know.
>0 people have been successfully recompensated to date for furry art theft.
You obviously missed my point that a Non-Furry artist has successfully done
so in Colorado by using pornographic furry art, and is successfully retired
with around three dozen people paying for the rest of their livelihood.
Received on Fri Mar 17 2006 - 17:15:25 CST