I'd sure like to see a source about this guy. I could retire right quick if
what YOU say is true.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Parenteau" <kitfox_at_firstlight.net>
To: <SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: [SkunkworksAMA] And here we go again...
> At 06:05 AM 3/17/2006, you wrote:
>>Not to be discouraging, but...
>>9 cases have been known filed as legal action against people over furry
>>art
>>theft. 7 were thrown out, as their respective states do not uphold
>>copyright on pornographic materials, and 2 resulted in the /arist/ being
>>penalized, as the material was deemed inappropriate by state standards
>>(under anti-obscenity acts)
>
> List your sources. The first seven you claim breaks federal law, not
> state
> law. As such, it shouldn't even touching state courts or state law. The
> "other two" are something that any lawyer who even gained bar should know.
>
>>0 people have been successfully recompensated to date for furry art theft.
>
> You obviously missed my point that a Non-Furry artist has successfully
> done
> so in Colorado by using pornographic furry art, and is successfully
> retired
> with around three dozen people paying for the rest of their livelihood.
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Fri Mar 17 2006 - 17:27:18 CST