Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: Well, congratulations!

From: Ross Sauer <archae_at_charter.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 01:45:51 -0500


Well Jim, might as well weigh in on this.
I had my own row with this bunch of defective Beavis and Butthead clones, when I blasted them for drawing and distributing porn of some comic strip characters, and their creator.

I got my share of grief from them.

I saw your reply to this bunch, it was concise and intelligent, which is why they can't understand it and wrote back "bullshit." <G>

Tell Des best thign to do is just ignore these dweebs.
Look at them for what they are, living in their parents' basement, and the only job they qualify for has them saying, "Uhh...you want fries with that?"

----- Original Message -----
  From: Take a wild, friggin guess
  To: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 1:17 AM
  Subject: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: Well, congratulations!


  My main concern was the potential negative impact that a flase
  claim like that could have to my standing. Most folks who know me
  know there are certain things I simply, absolutely will not draw, no
  matter how much money is waved in front of me.
  I posted my response to the situation on lulz.net. Hopefully,
  there will be enough brain cell activity there for the original
  posters to realize they were, indeed, wrong in their initial
  assessment. An apology would be nice, but I'm certain that is too
  much to hope for from such stunted individuals.
  In any case, Des and I got into a huge argument about this earlier
  today. I think I might have made a dent, though, as she doesn't
  seem quite so fired up about it. I told her to let me handle it in
  a diplomatic fashion. This is a time for careful factual
  presentation, not name-calling. Although, I must confess, sometimes
  I, too, wish I could rip some people a new ass. But ultimately,
  it's not that important. Her rant _was_ brutal, though (I proofread
  it). I honestly believe if she posted it, there would be a lot of
  people hurt and insulted by what she said, even if some of it IS
  true. And it's not my practice to be a party to that sort of
  malevolent behavior.
  I still got that photograph, though. It was taken last December, so
  it could be used in leiu (sp?) of whatever photo I couldn't find of
  me earlier (someone was asking about my beard or something?) Des is
  a little drunk in the photo, though, so I'd have to get her okay.
  It was taken at one of her friend's house parties (that she dragged
  me to, whee). Does film go bad over time? I ask this because that
  photo, as well as most of the other ones on that roll, are kinda
  shitty in quality. Or is that just because it's black and white
  film, and that doesn't photograph too well at night? I'll try to
  clean it up a little in Photoshop or something. It just looks kinda
  gritty. (I'm not a photographer, so I don't know these things). Of
  course, there could also have been something on the lens too, now
  that I think of it. Oh well. It's just a stupid photo.

--JMH, still trying to talk sense into the writhing masses of
  stupidity...



   
Received on Fri Sep 01 2006 - 23:43:47 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:52:14 CST