--- In SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com, "Take a wild, friggin guess"
<a_change_of_plans_at_...> wrote:
>
> --- In SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com, "longtom2222"
> <bigverybadtom_at_> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Um, forgive a stupid question from a silly old reactionary like
me,
> but
> > I do get the impression that you object to the idea of having
your
> > Skunk Girls made into plush dolls with the idea of people having
sex
> > with said dolls. I admit I'm totally at a loss to determine why
you
> > object to such a practice, since your Skunk Girls are supposed
to be
> > such total sexpots?
>
>
> Well, I think I'm going to be walking on eggshells here for this
> answer. I suppose it comes down to the simple fact that I
honestly
> can't seem to wrap my mind around such a thing. I'm certainly not
> blasting anyone who's into such a practice. You know, whatever
floats
> your boat and all that. But personally, I just don't "get it".
So maybe I'm limited in my scope, but I've always only seen this
> genre as an enjoyment of anthro characters and the books or movies
> they are in. Everything else after that, I just don't quite
> comprehend. Therefore, it seems to be a lack of range on my part.
>
> And I think my initial concern with the doll was that it would
> become more widespread, that several folks would want to
> have "anatomically correct" dolls made, and to be honest, it
really
> kinda creeped me out a little.
>
> But just a little. After all, I'm a creepy guy myself. ;P
>
> --JMH, and holy fuck was that a long-winded reply...
Well, not to start a long debate, but when you draw anthropomorphic
skunks (or any other being, human or animal) who engage in very
graphic sexual activity, it's quite logical to assume you intend to
cause sexual arousal among your viewers. Do you object to viewers
wanking at the sight of your Skunk Girls? Or anyone who might
depict themselves having sex with your characters, either in text
fiction or in artwork? I don't see why someone making an artificial
doll or fursuit of your Skunk Girls and using it for sexual purposes
would be so much worse than that, whether you get it or not.
No, in case anyone is wondering, I'm not interested in stuffed dolls
of any of the Skunk Girls for my sexual gratification. I just feel
it seems wrong to object to those who do. People used to call
homosexuality perverted as well, and if we're supposed to accept
that now, what's the objection to anything else?
Long Tom.
Received on Mon Jan 28 2008 - 10:27:45 CST